I hate [war] as the pacifists in bad or good faith never will. I loathe it. Every book I have written overflows with that loathing, and I cannot bear the sight of guns…When peace stands for surrender, fear, loss of dignity and freedom, it is no longer peace. It's suicide.Ms. Fallaci is being sued and will face trial in Italy for a book she wrote which purportedly insults Muslims.
- Oriana Fallaci
Do not let your fire go out, spark by irreplaceable spark, in the hopeless swamps of the approximate, the not-quite, the not-yet, the not-at-all. Do not let the hero in your soul perish, in lonely frustration for the life you deserved, but have never been able to reach. Check your road and the nature of your battle. The world you desired can be won. It exists, it is real, it is possible, it is yours. - Ayn Rand
Friday, December 30, 2005
I Hate War Too...But Evil Even More
Thursday, December 29, 2005
VIGGO SCHMIGGO: Update
Anonymous said...Sue for child support payments? lol. They settled, you idiot, out of court, and he and his ex are still friends. Trying to dig up dirt on the V-man is hard, ain't it?
You're a bleeping idiot.
You see, he/she makes a point that one can construe "facts" based on partial information. Case in point: the reference I made to the Smoking Gun scan of a legal petition for an increase in child support payments. It was not a dirt-digging mission and I didn't make it up, but used it to make a point. It's easy to judge another based on tidbits of information and as I noted, it's his personal biz, but he should hold up a mirror and perhaps hold judgement--because his perceptions, though he has every right to express them, may or may not reflect the truth.
Secondly, Anonymous decides to end his/her comment with "You're a bleeping idiot" which clearly reflects his/her state of mind. He/she is angry. Name-calling is an easy out, a way to diminish another. I'm an idiot because I have a point of view... I'm an idiot because I ask that those with media "power" take a more measured approached to the things they say... I'm an idiot because I state we need to be kind in words and in action.
If this is Anonymous' definition of an Idiot, I guess I'll take it as a compliment. Thanks Anonymous!
And finally, Viggo perhaps says it best:
"Be kind. It’s worthwhile to make an effort to learn about other people and figure out what you might have in common with them. If you allow yourself to be somewhat curious — and if you get into the habit of doing that—it’s the first step to being open minded… and realizing that your points of view aren’t totally opposite. I don’t think anyone’s are, in the end. It’s just a question of finding out by spending time with them or giving their ideas a chance to be considered." -2004
Monday, December 19, 2005
Planet of the Apes...
A GERMAN art expert was fooled into believing a painting done by a chimpanzee was the work of a master.Now THAT'S funny! Makes me think there may be a market for my paintings...
Speaking of apes, check this out: Stalin's Mutant Ape Army
SOVIET dictator Josef Stalin ordered his scientists to cross humans with APES to create an invincible breed of Red Army soldiers, secret documents show.
Sunday, December 18, 2005
In an Alternate Universe
This very liberal principle that has become U.S. policy since 2001, i.e. of attempting to address the root cause of the Islamofascism disease, should have liberal magazines, newspapers, organizations and politicians praising and embracing the successes and sacrifices of our country and most importantly of the more than 2,000 souls who have perished in the hopes of securing the future for all of us--not just Americans, but all freedom-loving peoples of the world.
But no, this is not an alternate Universe. And instead of heading off into the New Year feeling good about the risks we've taken and the results garnered, we're to feel bad that the Gov't is snooping on us (forget that Hollywood is too) and the gains we've made are to be lost in the ba-humbugs of the Christmas Grinches.
Wednesday, December 14, 2005
VIGGO SCHMIGGO
Frankly, the trashing, bashing & re-hashing of the same ol' argument is soo tiring. America BAD everyone else GOOD. Case in point:
Viggo Mortensen of The Lord of the Rings fame, recently conducted an interview and as he did, he placed a small UN flag on the table in front of him. The UN FLAG! I ask you, what has the UN done for anyone lately? Seriously? When I say the following, what comes to mind?
I have no problem with him speaking his “mind”, but for a guy who is supposed to be well-read, he obviously hasn’t read enough. His expressed thoughts are actually emotion-based, not intellect-based and he supplies no facts—just slanders, accuses and judges.
“I’m not anti-Bush; I’m anti-Bush behavior,” Mortensen told Progressive magazine. “In other words, I’m against cheating, greed, cruelty, racism, imperialism, religious fundamentalism, treason, and the seemingly limitless capacity for hypocrisy shown by Bush and his administration.”
Look, I know that it's his own personal bus, but when someone starts judging others, well, it's time to hold the mirror up. It’s fine to speak your mind, but when you have a world audience and influence it becomes imperative to stick to facts—for the benefit of all of us. And whether you like it or not, W is the Pres. and it IS a reflection on US when people start making our leaders out to be criminals. It was the same with Clinton and before him Reagan.
I'm not anti-Viggo, I'm just anti-Viggo behavior.
Monday, December 12, 2005
Tookie Chose Death
Tookie chose death in his decision to execute 4 innocent people which resulted in his execution and his supporters chose ignorance, cruelty and selfish indignation.
"Tonight is a planned, efficient, calculated, antiseptic, cold-blooded murder,'' Joan Baez said.
Jesse Jackson paid a final visit with Williams and said the condemned man was trying to remain positive.
"Tell those who came, to follow my message -- anti-violence and anti-drugs," Jackson said Williams told him.
"We must not give up on redemption," Jackson said. "(Gov.) Arnold (Schwarzenegger) had a choice to make. He read the polls and washed his hands. But the blood will be there for a long time.''
"He's no threat to society," the civil rights leader added. "Why kill killing with killing?"
Thursday, December 08, 2005
Homeless Shelter-less for the Holidays
But, here's a solution (I'm certain it's not original): There are hundreds if not thousands of churches in my hometown--from small to large -- why not open them up to accomodate the homeless? Many have kitchens, bathrooms and fellowship halls with plenty room to house the homeless or at least get them out of the cold for a spell.
Afterall, isn't this the time of year when a homeless family found shelter in a manger?
What's the deal with vacant churches --6 of the 7 days of the week they're empty and not being used. Seems a big waste of space and potential for good.
I know dealing with the homeless is challenging and sometimes, well many times, safety is an issue, but giving them at least a few more options other than the street and freezing to death seems the Christian thing to do, doesn't it? And hey, it's not just Christian churches with space to spare, but also Synagogues and Mosques.
Is giving to the Salvation Army and plopping a dollar in the church donation basket this time of year an attempt to pay off our collective guilt by letting others take care of the problem?
Tuesday, December 06, 2005
A FRENCH LIBERTARIAN...Une fille après mon propre coeur
Regarding the Liberation of Iraq by America & the coalition:
"I for one think that it's always good to be free of a tyrant. And when Liberté j'écris ton nom advocated intervening in Iraq, our arguments were not on the issue of weapons of mass destruction — they were on the issue that Saddam Hussein is a real tyrant and we have to get rid of him.
"We advocate freedom in France, and the Iraqis also should be free. They were not genetically created to be slaves. I think that when the people in France demonstrated against war, they didn't want peace for the Iraqis — they wanted peace for themselves.
"It's a matter of human rights. I think human rights are more important than culture. To me, cultural relativism is just a way to justify when human rights are being violated. "
[emphasis added]
Tookie Monster
Look I was for the Death Penalty before I was against it and it may be possible to hold conflicting positions on any number of things. It's always the OTHERS that try to pin you to absolutes. In this case, I'm in favor of an absolute or rather "final" solution. So, I'm really not against death as a penalty...afterall, don't we all face it at some point with or without penalties?
Tookie wants to live, but not bad enough to give it up ("snitch" in his words) so that others can live free from violence and fear in the neighborhoods that are owned by the Crips.
There are reasons to oppose/fight the death penalty and that day may come very soon. But Tookie is not the poster boyee for those willing to come to the table.
Creating a UN-Style Peace Farce
The rant of late is that the American military is FIGHTING a war, rather than being a "FORCE FOR PEACE" i.e. standing by and letting others fight it out as was the model for the UN "Peacekeepers" in
After all, European lives and American lives have greater value than other lives don't you know, so why bother getting involved in a battle not our own?
The same rationale is now being offered for
Sunday, December 04, 2005
Sticking Up for Saddam: Ramsey Clark admits that his client is guilty.
[Excerpt from Slate.com 12/2/05] ...
Rather than say what substance I think Ramsey Clark is made of, I shall quote from Jeffrey Blankfort. There are various Web sites devoted to undermining the war effort in Iraq, one or two of which are also devoted to attacks on my own moral turpitude. I can't read them all but I do usually look at the e-mail I get from Blankfort. He is a very serious guy with whom I have had a few exchanges. He is one of the few to have noticed what Ramsey Clark said, and here is his comment:
The problem is … that Clark is one of the most well-known representatives of the anti-war movement and represents ANSWER coalition and in my mind this is more than the conflict of interest that it unquestionably is. Thus, the message that it sends to the Iraqi people is that the anti-war movement doesn't really care about any Iraqis other than those who have been killed by US and UK forces, that it, in fact, does not condemn Saddam for his long history of human rights violations and for his launching a bloody war against Iran that took well over a million lives.
That is to say the least of it. He adds:
It is long past time for the anti-war movement to drop its double standards. It can begin by saying Ramsey Clark does not speak for us. He certainly does not speak for me.This is a nice twist on the self-regarding "Not In Our Name" slogan under which the anti-war movement filled the streets to hear speeches from Saddam sympathizers, Fidel and Kim groupies, and Islamic fundamentalists. Not really anti-war at all, but pro-war on the other side. It was more like a single standard if you ask me, but let's put this to the test.
So, how about it, Cindy Sheehan and Michael Moore and Tim Robbins and all the rest of you? Do you need any prompting to say what you think? Or is the only crime scene to be found in the Downing Street memo and the identifying of a CIA bureaucrat? We know what Clark is made of: What about you? I meanwhile shall recline, happy in the knowledge that Saddam Hussein has engaged the services of an attorney who proclaims him to be guilty as charged. [emphasis added]
Saturday, December 03, 2005
This is What I'm Talkin' 'Bout
by Jack Kelly
Friday, 02 December 2005
In his speech at the Naval Academy Wednesday outlining U.S. strategy in Iraq, President Bush paid tribute to Marine Corporal Jeffrey Starr, killed in a fire fight in Ar Ramadi April 30th. He was 22, on his third tour in Iraq.
A letter to his girlfriend was found on Starr's laptop computer:
"If you're reading this, then I've died in Iraq," Cpl. Starr wrote. "I don't regret going. Everybody dies but a few get to do it for something as important as freedom. It may seem confusing why we're in Iraq; it's not to me. I'm here helping these people so they can live the way we live, not to have to worry about tyrants or vicious dictators. Others have died for my freedom; now this is my mark."
In a mammoth article in October taking note of the 2,000th U.S. death in Iraq, the New York Times mentioned Cpl. Starr and his letter, but didn't quote the passages above. All the Times quoted from his letter was: "'I kind of predicted this,' Corporal Starr wrote of his own death. 'A third time just seemed like I'm pushing my chances.'"
The Times' omissions and distortions -- which are more the rule than the exception in news coverage of Iraq -- explain why so many Americans think we're losing a war we're plainly winning.
[snip]
When Rep. Murtha called for immediate withdrawal from Iraq, he led the network newscasts. But when Sen. Lieberman -- who had just returned from his fourth trip to Iraq -- declared Tuesday that "visible and practical" progress has been made, neither ABC or CBS mentioned it on their evening newscasts, and neither the New York Times nor the Washington Post published a single word of what he had to say.
Some in the media go beyond omission and distortion to outright fabrication, as Reuters news service did the day after the president's speech.
"Iraqi militants attacked a U.S. base and a local government building with mortar rounds and rockets in Ramadi, west of Baghdad, on Thursday, before holding ground on several streets, residents said," Reuters reported. "They've taken control of all the main streets and other sections of Ramadi."
But Marine Captain Jeffrey Pool, who is stationed in Ramadi, said: "as of 2:00 p.m. there were no signs of significant insurgent activity anywhere in the city. At 9:30 a.m. an RPG was fired at a joint U.S.-Iraqi observation post which in no damages or casualties. That is all. No other attacks."
Capt. Pool said the false report of an al Qaida offensive in Ramadi "is clearly a sign of how desperate insurgents have become." It's also a sign of how desperate Reuters is becoming, as progress in Iraq becomes more difficult to ignore.
Friday, December 02, 2005
DAMN! DAMN! DAMN!
Thursday, December 01, 2005
Oil IS Blood...
Environmental & global economic issues aside, I don't take issue with the Iraq war being "for oil" because oil is FOOD and medicine and education and hospitals and shelter and luxury items, not just for Americans but for those that peddle the black gold. For Saudis and too long for Iraqis, the spoils of oil were bequethed to the excellency of the Saudi family, Saddam and the elite upper class of those societies and never trickled down to the common folk. As the populations live in squalor, the king, princes and dictators live in splendor.
Christopher Hitchens made a similar point in a recent Slate.com article:
How strange that the anti-war left should have forgotten all of its Marxism and superciliously ignored the fact that oil is blood: lifeblood for Iraqis and others. Under Saddam it was wholly privatized; now it can become more like a common resource. But it will need to be protected against those who would shed it and spill it without compunction, and we might as well become used to the fact. With or without a direct Anglo-American garrison, there is an overwhelming humanitarian and international and civilizational interest in defeating the Arab Khmer Rouge that threatens Mesopotamia, and if we could achieve agreement on that single point, the other disagreements would soon disclose themselves as being of a much lesser order. [emphasis added]